If this entry does not scare you or atleast make you second guess everything that you have heard come from Obama's mouth then you do not deserve to vote.
If you read the post just prior to this one, then you already know that one of the reasons that I cannot support Barack Obama is that too little is known about him. Well, a bit more of his past has come to my attention, and it doesn't bode well for Obama at all.
My information is coming from the NRO:
First let me introduce the two main characters that will be featured in this post. Firstly, we have Barack Obama, whom we all know (well, not as much as you would think). And, secondly to Obama's dismay, we have William Ayers. Ayers, a devout American indeed, is responsible for many bombings of governmental buildings including the Pentagon, U.S. Capitol, and a number of police stations throughout America. He did all this under the Weathermen terrorist organization. So yes, put 2 and 2 together and you have yourself a terrorist.
In fact, Ayers told the New York Times that "he regretted only failing to carry out more attacks — and that America still 'makes me want to puke'."
Anyway, recently released government documents have linked Obama into a close friendship with this man. It is a good thing that to Obama, Ayers is merely "a guy who lives in my neighborhood" (I don't know about you but I wouldn't want to live in the same state with this terrorist, let alone the same "neighborhood"). So, obviously the two were never close and therefore Barack has nothing to worry about, right? wrong again.
Two points can be made about Obama in this article:
1) To deny a relationship beyond that of a mere aquaintance, would be a complete lie on Obama's part. William Ayers served as professor at the University of Illinois and continually encouraged all of his students to question all that is America. Then, Michelle Obama (then a dean at the U of I) actually invited this known terrorist to serve on a panel with her and her husband BARACK OBAMA!!! What was there goal? To "block proposed legislation that would throw more juvenile offenders into the adult system.”
Not only did he serve on this panel with the terrorist, but later he would serve on the Board of the Woods Fund (served first in 1997) for several years. Again, to serve on a board with someone for several years and still say that he did not really know Ayers is a lie. What did this board do?
The Woods Fund raises money for charitable reasons. Awww... so innocent, but where does the money go? The money they raised went to the Trinity Church, the same church in which "Jeremiah Wright preached a radical, anti-American brand of Black Liberation Theology" (If you remember right Obama also tried to claim that he was not associated with Wright either. That's funny since he never had a problem donating to his church.)
Also, they would donate to the Arab American Action Network ("co-founded by Rashid Khalidi, a Yasser Arafat apologist who has supported attacks against Israel and now directs Columbia University’s notorious Middle East Institute, founded by Edward Said").
2) If Barack did not have such a close relationship with this ugly, sick person, then why does he go to such trouble to hide everything. In rebuttal to these accusations, Obama has headed a three-headed retaliation. First, he created an ad which really did not really do anything for him. Secondly, Barack threatened television stations that should they run an ad professing the above, he would hurt them and their advertisers financially (kind of a strong threat for a guy who has nothing to hide, don't ya think?). And lastly, Barack threatened to call for the Justice Department to muzzle political speech through the prospect of a criminal investigation. In my opinion, this is just a sneak peak of what life will be like under the Barack Administration.
In conclusion, Barack is way too sketchy to deserve any sort of trust from Americans. Barack not only associates himself with terrorists and the like, but then lies about it. Kind of reminds me of another sketchy, lying president (Bill Clinton ring any bells?). The sad fact is, just about every single word ejecting from Barack's mouth seems to be little more than lies.
If you agree with what I have said, please comment and for the love of America, please pass on this truth to Republicans and Democrats alike. Although Obama seems to have dug himself into a hole (a very deep one at that), if you wish to try to defend Obama fell free to do so.
NRO link: http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZDI4YzUyYmI1ZjA1OWUzMDA5ZDIzNTI4NTk5ZmYwYWY=&w=MA==
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
8 comments:
First off, impressing blog!
but heres my opinion, I'm definitely an anti obama follower; however, whether i choose to be against him or not i believe on must be rational and look at the hole spectrum.
I agree with your second to last paragraph completely, very well said, yet if you were trying to prove Obama to be a terrorist though this, i think it is a little unrealistic.
I believe Ayers and Obama's relationship is not healthy for Obama's campaign. but the thought that he must be a terrorist because of this acquaintance seems a shot in the dark.
However I'm still not sure if that was your view. you seem to be smarter than just coming to that type of conclusion cause of one relationship. But if you were just portraying that Obama has stuff in his past or future goals that he is trying to hide, i agree and that makes total sense.
but nice argument kyle :)
Thanks for your comment : )... I was not trying to portray Obama as a terrorist. I was simply trying to show how little is known about him and how much he tries to hide.
The man you are saying is a horrible person, was actually found innocent remember?
This is for Nick,
first of all, yes I did say that man is a horrible person (William Ayers) and I will not change my mind.
Secondly, the reason he is not in prison today is due to a legal technicality. He was not found innocent, he was more or less acquitted - BIG DIFFERENCE.
Once more, he has admitted to every act to which he has been accused and holds no remorse nor shows any regret of his actions. That is why I see him as a horrible man.
And lastly, I would just want to throw up being in the same room with the man. But that someone would want to serve on a Board with him for more than a minute, let alone years, is unnerving.
It is just scary to think of the kind of people that Barack will surround himself with to find success.
A legal technicality still means he was not proven guilty. Maybe he isnt the greatest person alive, but do I need to bring up John Hagey?
Everybody has skeletons in their closet...
Okay Nick,
But you didn't say anything about a legal technicality in your first comment... you said he was innocent.
Well when you look up his record and I dont mean any Wikipedia crap, I mean his actual Government file, Im pretty sure it will say aquitted, not legal technicality
And last time I checked those who were aquitted could not be proven guilty, kind of sounds a little closely to innocent...
The point I am trying to make is the fact that he is not innocent of the crimes he committed - he admitted to them.
The federal officers in charge of his case messed up somewhere... that is the only reason he is not in jail now... no jury ever found him "innocent"
And I just find it hard to believe that people still say he is not guilty when openly admits to all he is accused of.
The guy bombed many gov't buildings while putting countless numbers of people at risk.
My method of reasoning - if you have reason to believe that there will be drugs at the party then just don't go. Ayers is well known for his acts as a Weatherman yet Barack still has no problem being in his company.
Poor Judgement call.
Post a Comment